
Welcome to The Connection,
NASAP’s Online Newsletter
November 2025 Issue
Dear Adlerians,
As we proceed into Winter, NASAP is thrilled to present you with our November/December issue of The Connection.
Earlier this year, we featured a guest article by Rebecca Kase, a trauma specialist who discussed her work in an Adlerian context. We are delighted to now officially launch a regular guest series; please enjoy Dr. Michele Leno’s article about mind ruts and Dr. Jennifer Levin’s article about surviving the suicide of a loved one in this issue – again presented from Adlerian perspectives.
We look forward to offering you additional guest articles in the future from a collection of behavioral health specialists, each discussing their work through an Adlerian lens. As I have begun collecting and reviewing these various contributions, I have been struck by how Adler’s holistic and commonsense theories of personality and counseling apply so well to the later specializations in behavioral health which have emerged since his time. Adler was truly a pioneer and a visionary.
Whether you are facing this season in mild climates, or, like me, steeling yourselves from the New England cold, I wish you a pleasant closeout to 2025 and a joyful holiday season.
As always, as you read this issue, please consider how you might contribute to The Connection in the future. Feel free to submit your articles, announcements, and photos to the email address below.
Sincerely,
Ellen Alderton, Editor
NASAPNews@gmail.com
P.S. If you wish to receive future issues of The Connection, be sure to sign up for a NASAP membership. Use the button in the top right corner to access the member login/sign-up page. There are several membership levels to choose from, and you will then be eligible for other member perks like discounts on conference registrations.
Dear Fellow Adlerians,
Warm Regards,
Hallie M. Williams, Sr.
President, North American Society of Adlerian Psychology
President’s Message:
Updates from HQ, November 2025
By Susan Belangee, Ph.D., NASAP Executive Director
Truly,
Susan
The Silent Divide: How Lying Erodes Family Belonging
By Jess Minckley, MFA, LMHC, ATR-BC
Lying could be a “white lie,” lies by omission, or something more serious. There are more socially acceptable forms of lying, such as people-pleasing. This way of dealing with problems can help temporarily. Sometimes, people feel that lying is a mercy or a protection of others. And sometimes people can’t face the truth, and lying is a casualty of denial.
Adler wrote "A lie would have no sense unless the truth were felt as dangerous," in his 1929 book Problems of Neurosis. Then, fear would be at the root of all lies. This fear can be deleterious to others, eroding their sense of Gemeinschaftsgefühl or social interest.
In the intricate tapestry of family constellations, lies are like a snagged thread, quietly unraveling the fabric of belongingness. The innate human need to connect with others and contribute to the wellbeing of the group is founded upon consensus reality. What reality is context dependent, but, finding out the truth to a large-scale lie can affect someone else’s sense of safety in relationships. The truth, (and the act of someone else keeping secrets from them) could affect one’s self-concept, relationships, and/or their meaning-making machine, (i.e., “I am not sure anymore”; or “people think I can’t handle the truth”; or “life lacks certainty”; and/or “therefore, I must be emotionally closed off in order to belong”).
In families, each member needs to feel a sense of being valued and shared purpose. When we have a high degree of social interest, we understand that our personal wellbeing is tied to the wellbeing of the family as a whole. We act in ways that build up, rather than tear down, these bonds. Lying, by its very nature, is an act of separation. It creates a chasm.
When a family member lies, they are, in essence, withdrawing from the shared reality of the group. This isn’t just about dishonesty; it’s about a refusal or reluctance to engage in the vulnerable, imperfect, and sometimes difficult process of being seen and known as they are. The hidden message is: "I cannot trust you will accept me regardless," or "I won’t be safe if you know."
When an adult lies, they damage the whole group’s Gemeinschaftsgefühl. When we deceive, obscure, or shirk, we're not contributing to the shared understanding and trust that a family needs to thrive. We’re prioritizing our individual desires (i.e., I want to avoid conflict, save face, get what I want). This is not horizontal striving, the desire to be one among many; it is vertical striving, a focus on self.
A person who lies is often discouraged. They’re attempting to achieve belonging backwards, believing the "real" them—with their mistakes, their failures, their true desires or thoughts or opinions or needs–wont’ be accepted. This is a painful reality for many. And, the more we isolate ourselves, we reinforce the lack of belonging we are trying to avoid.
The ideal antidote to lies is not shame or punishment, but a renewed commitment to courage and connection. Families can build a foundation of psychological safety where honesty, even when difficult, is valued above all else. This means fostering an environment where mistakes are seen as opportunities for growth, and where the truth—no matter how messy—is a path to deeper intimacy and trust.
Ultimately, belonging in a family isn't about being perfect; it's about being known, warts and all. Lying may offer a temporary escape from discomfort, but it costs us and our loved ones the profound and irreplaceable feeling of truly belonging to something bigger than ourselves.
Source: Adler, A. (1929). Problems of neurosis: A book of case histories. Cosmopolitan Book Corporation.
Mind Ruts and How to Get Out of Them
By Dr. Michele Leno, Ph.D., LP
We all get stuck. Whether it’s replaying a conversation you wish had gone differently or doubting every decision before you even make it, mind ruts — those repetitive, stubborn loops of thought — are a familiar experience for many. But just because they’re common doesn’t mean they’re harmless. Over time, these loops can drain your mental energy, distort your perception, and quietly shape how you see yourself and others.
So, what’s behind this mental quicksand, and more importantly, how do you get out of it?
What are mind ruts?
Alfred Adler asserts that the desire for significance and belonging motivates people. From an Adlerian perspective, mind ruts are more than just bad habits. They're often unconscious strategies we use to protect ourselves or make sense of the world. When life events challenge our sense of worth or control, our minds can retreat into repetitive thought patterns as a way to regain a feeling of safety or certainty.
That inner monologue might sound like “I always mess things up” or “No one really listens to me.” These thoughts don’t just appear out of nowhere. They’re usually shaped by early experiences, social comparisons, and our perceived role in the family constellation.
Mind ruts can become particularly sticky when they align with a personal narrative we’ve unknowingly accepted. If you’ve always felt responsible for others, for example, your mind might default to guilt or self-blame when something goes wrong, even if it wasn’t your fault.
How to know you’re caught
Sometimes, mind ruts are obvious, like obsessively reviewing a mistake you made at work. But more often, they show up subtly. You might feel exhausted without a clear reason, snap at someone over something small, or lose motivation for things you normally enjoy. These could be signs that repetitive thoughts are hijacking your mental energy.
A good starting point is to notice patterns. Do you always catastrophize when faced with uncertainty? Do you assume others are upset with you, even without evidence? The goal isn’t to shame yourself — it’s to get curious. As Adler emphasized, behavior is goal oriented. These mental loops often serve a hidden function, even if they no longer help you.
Mind ruts — those repetitive, stuck thought patterns — are something many people experience but often struggle to overcome. What causes these mental loops, and how can we break free from them to improve our well-being and decision-making?
Strategies to shift your thinking
Breaking free from mind ruts doesn’t happen overnight. But with consistent practice, you can start to shift those patterns. Here are a few evidence-based techniques grounded in both Adlerian theory and modern psychology:
1. Mindfulness
Mindfulness helps create a pause between your thoughts and your reactions. You don’t have to meditate for an hour; just start by noticing your thoughts without judgment. Even saying to yourself, “I’m having the thought that…” can create a little distance and make it easier to respond with intention rather than impulse.
2. Cognitive reframing
Cognitive reframing is about changing how you interpret a situation. Let’s say you didn’t get the job you wanted. A mind rut might lead you to think, “I’ll never succeed.” Reframing might sound like, “That opportunity wasn’t the right fit, but I’m still moving forward.” It’s not about forced positivity — it’s about loosening the grip of one rigid perspective.
3. Behavior first, feelings follow
Adler believed that actions could help reorient thinking. Sometimes the best way to escape a mind rut is to do something different — even if you don’t feel like it. Call a friend, go for a walk, or start a small task. These shifts in behavior can disrupt the feedback loop and start to change your internal dialogue.
The importance of self-compassion
Mind ruts often come with shame. “Why can’t I stop thinking this way?” is a question many ask themselves. But shame only deepens the pattern. Self-compassion offers a healthier alternative. When you catch yourself spiraling, try talking to yourself like you would a close friend. This approach is not about excusing harmful thoughts; it’s about creating a supportive environment where change is possible.
As Adler noted, discouragement is often the root of psychological struggle. Cultivating encouragement — through patience, kindness, and realistic expectations — can be the most powerful first step in healing.
Building a more flexible mindset
Breaking mind ruts isn’t just about stopping negative thoughts. It’s also about developing the kind of mental flexibility that enables you to adapt, grow, and feel resilient in the face of change. That includes:
● Recognizing when your thoughts are black-and-white.
● Challenging assumptions instead of accepting them.
● Allowing space for uncertainty.
When you begin to see your thoughts as one possible version of the story — not the only truth — you open the door to new choices, healthier relationships, and more aligned decision-making.
Final thoughts
Mind ruts can feel isolating, but they’re often a shared human experience, especially in moments of transition, loss, or self-doubt. While they may be rooted in old patterns, they don’t have to define your future.
With self-awareness, consistent practice, and a little self-compassion, it’s entirely possible to shift your mental landscape. And as Adler would say, it’s not about eliminating flaws — it’s about striving for courage, community, and contribution in a way that feels meaningful to you.
The mind may get stuck, but it’s never beyond repair.
– As seen in Psychology Today, Insider, Cosmopolitan, and on WBRC Fox 6 News, Dr. Michele Leno is a native of Detroit and a licensed psychologist in Michigan. She is currently hosting the TV talk show “Mind Matters with Dr. Michele” on CW50.
Receive a Free CE Credit for Reading a Classic Article This September
Reference: Birnbaum, F. (1936). Some principles to be observed in a healthy conduct of life. International Journal of Individual Psychology, 2(3), 46-54.
Go to https://nasap.thinkific.com/, create an account if you don’t have one, search for “Birnbaum,” and click on the “Principles of Healthy Conduct” course page to begin. You can download the article, then answer the quiz and receive 1.1 CE hours.
Author Information: Ferdinand Birnbaum (1892 – 1947) was trained as a secondary school teacher. He met Adler in 1920 and became active in Viennese Individual Psychology. From 1924 to 1934 he participated in the Individual Psychology Experimental School with Oskar Spiel and Franz Scharmer. During World War II, he belonged to an illegal Individual Psychology working group, and after the war he tried to revive the Association for Individual Psychology in Vienna.
Birnbaum (1936) discusses five principles of healthy living – sovereignty, initiative, solidarity, productiveness, and meliorism – operationalizing the Individual Psychology construct of Gemeinschaftsgefühl. These principles emphasize the “… obligation to assume full responsibility for oneself” (p. 46), taking into account “… the common natural ties existing among all human beings” (p. 48), and being active, useful, and optimistic. He emphasizes that the formula for proper living has not been found as well as the aspirational nature of these principles in the “… three relationships in which every human being is unavoidably involved: society, work, and sex” (p. 46).
He also describes a three-step process for addressing the errors in one’s style of living. The first step is to identify the mistakes, which he calls “… infantile behavior which are continued even after they are divorced from the early childhood situation of their origin” (p. 46). The second step is “… to examine my childhood with regard to finding out the incentive and the opportunity it gave me for developing the character traits” (p. 47). The third step is a “… movement toward a conscious assumption of responsibility for by behavior” (p. 47) emerging out of “… repeated experiences of discovery” (p. 47). “Individual Psychology knows only one ‘sin’ – the retention of a mistaken infantile attitude, which always manifests itself in a choking of the community feeling by an exaggerated desire for power” (pp. 47-48).
Working Through Trauma After Suicide: Approaches for Mental Health Professionals
By Dr. Jennifer R. Levin, LMFT
The death of a loved one by suicide is traumatic, devastating and disorienting. Not only does it disrupt the survivor’s assumptive world, the belief that the world is safe, predictable, and meaningful, but suicide loss results in confusion, unanswered questions, and unspeakable pain. Adlerian foundations can be used to provide a path to restore purpose and create a meaningful life after a suicide loss.
Understanding the Traumatic Grief of Suicide
The suicide of a loved one is sudden, shocking, and emotionally destabilizing. Even when there have been previous suicide attempts, survivors are left trying to make sense of their loved one’s death, cope with the pain of grief, and often manage trauma symptoms associated with the suicide. From an Adlerian lens, this kind of loss challenges one’s unique way of understanding themselves and the world, and requires reorientation to find meaning in a life permanently changed.
This shattering of their assumptive world leaves survivors feeling unsafe, fearful, and emotionally shattered. In these moments, the Adlerian concept of Gemeinschaftsgefühl becomes critical. The stigma that often surrounds suicide loss can make the grieving process extremely isolating. Helping clients connect with others who understand their experience and pain is vital to rebuilding connections. Suicide support groups, suicide specific resources, and grief organizations can help foster a sense of community, and in time, help survivors reestablish or recreate a sense of purpose or meaning in their life.
Living with Unanswered Questions
One of the most painful aspects of suicide grief is the presence of unanswered questions and high levels of uncertainty that survivors live with. These include:
● What were they thinking in their final moments?
● Were they scared?
● Were they in pain?
● Why couldn’t they hold on a little longer?
● Is there something I could have done to prevent this?
These questions can consume survivors in the emotional distress of endless mental loops. To help break this cycle, encourage clients to externalize their questions by writing them down. Help your clients organize them into what can and cannot be known. Tap into the Adlerian principles of creative power and courage. Together work on ways the client can tolerate uncertainty and live with the unknown.
Although your clients may never find the answers to some of their questions, identifying what is known, unknown, and unknowable helps them regain some sense of control, however small, and begin creating a meaningful future for themselves. Guide them to shape compassionate interpretations and focus on purposeful, life-affirming actions.
Catastrophic Thinking and Alternative Narratives
In the unexpected loss of a loved one, particularly due to suicide, the survivor’s mind often drifts toward worst-case scenarios. Catastrophic thinking can exacerbate traumatic grief and result in guilt or self-blame. Survivors may obsess over whether their loved one suffered, was alone, or terrified in their final moments.
In therapy, guide clients to imagine alternate, more compassionate possibilities. What if their loved one felt peace? What if they weren’t aware of what was happening? What if they felt spiritually connected or surrounded by love?
This exercise expands the narrative and aligns with Adlerian thought allowing space for courageous and hopeful reinterpretation. The goal is not to “know” the truth, but to find emotional relief by acknowledging multiple possibilities, some of which may bring comfort.
Reclaiming a Sense of Control
To help clients regain a sense of control after traumatic loss, have them identify all of the things in their life that they can and cannot control. This practical step reinforces the Adlerian value of agency. Although survivors cannot go back and change the events that surrounded their loved one’s suicide, they can control how they respond to the death of their loved one. This includes small acts of self care, daily routines, and the choice to spend time with others or alone. It also encompasses large decisions such as how they manage their grief, integrate the memory of their loved one into their life, or honor their loved one’s story or legacy going forward.
When clients understand what is beyond their ability to control, they are better able to release unrealistic expectations. This shift can reduce symptoms of anxiety and depression, and provide a new sense of emotional freedom necessary to move toward healing.
Toward Cognitive Closure and Reengagement
As survivors move through grief, they may become weary of ambiguity and desire cognitive closure (Kruglanski and Webster 1996). In therapy, the concept of closure can be expanded to include acceptance, meaning-making, or peace after the suicide death of a loved one. Explore the concept of closure with your client to identify and create a definition that is meaningful to them.
Remember, Adler emphasized that all behavior is goal-driven, reflecting the human desire for significance and belonging. When viewed through the lens of cognitive closure, the search for answers after a suicide loss can be seen as a purposeful attempt to restore order, meaning, and connection in a world that now feels fragmented and uncertain. Work with your clients as they strive to meet the fundamental human goals of making sense of their experience and re-establishing a place of safety and belonging.
Conclusion: Healing Within Uncertainty
While no one fully “heals” from the suicide of a loved one, it is possible to live again, and even live fully, meaningfully, and with purpose. By blending the tools of trauma-informed grief work with Adlerian principles of social interest, creative power, and striving for significance, therapists can support clients in navigating their darkest hours and finding a path forward.
The aim is not to erase the pain but to hold it with compassion and courage, together.
About the Author: Jennifer R. Levin, PhD, LMFT, FT, is a nationally recognized expert in traumatic grief and sudden loss who helps organizations and individuals respond to unexpected loss with compassion and structure. As founder of Traumatic Grief Solutions, she provides crisis response consulting, grief leadership training, and trauma-informed coaching for executives and HR leaders to reduce the long-term emotional and financial costs of sudden workplace loss. A licensed therapist, she is one of fewer than 300 mental health professionals worldwide credentialed as a Fellow in Thanatology (the study of death, dying, and bereavement). Her new book, “The Traumatic Loss Workbook: Powerful Skills for Navigating the Grief Caused by a Sudden or Unexpected Death,” and online course, “Traumatic Loss Companion Course: A Guided Path to Healing,” provide practical tools to help readers cope with grief, process trauma, and find meaning again.
Congratulations to Dr. Cubie Bragg
Dr. Cubie Bragg, Director of the Adler-Dreikurs Institute of Human Services and coordinator of the Adlerian Counseling Psychology Program at Bowie State University, was awarded the Maryland Counseling Association’s award for Outstanding Professional Award of the Year this past Friday, September 26th. The Maryland Counseling Association is an affiliate of the American Counseling Association.
Try the November photo challenge.
Try the November photo challenge.
Our readers enjoyed the May photo challenge so much that we are delighted to feature this game again. Tim Hartshorne has provided us with yet another picture to tickle your memories. Please write to NASAPNews@gmail.com with your best guesses about the people in the photo below. Special bonus points to anyone who can name the venue and/or the year!
XXXX
XXX
xxx